The Rise and Regulatory Oversight of Insurance Aggregator Platforms: Impact on Policyholder Choice and Literacy in India

 

Yogindra Wavikar ¹, Dr. Deepa Damodaran ², Dr. Bhawna Sharma ³

 

¹ BBA 3rd Year Student at Amity Business School, Amity University, Mumbai, India

² Associate Professor, PHD. Guide- Amity Business School Mumbai, Amity University, India

³ Director International Affairs and Programs, Officiating HOI, Amity Business School, Amity University Mumbai, India

 

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1.    Background and Context

The insurance sector in India has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past two decades. From a state-dominated monopoly structure prior to 2000, the industry has evolved into a competitive marketplace characterized by multiple distribution channels and innovative technology-driven platforms. Insurance web aggregators represent one of the most disruptive innovations in this evolution, leveraging digital technology to create transparent, consumer-centric platforms that consolidate offerings from multiple insurers.

These platforms have democratized access to insurance information in ways previously unimaginable. Consumers can now compare products, evaluate pricing structures, understand policy features, and make informed decisions without physically visiting multiple insurance offices or depending exclusively on agents who may represent conflicting interests. The digital transformation has been particularly significant in a country as geographically vast and demographically diverse as India.

The regulatory framework for insurance aggregators was formally established through the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) Insurance Web Aggregators Regulations 2017. These regulations defined clear eligibility criteria, operational requirements, and consumer protection mechanisms that would govern how these platforms could operate. Major players including PolicyBazaar, InsuranceDekho, Coverfox, ComparePolicy, and Ditto have emerged as dominant forces, with PolicyBazaar alone commanding approximately 93% market share among digital insurance distributors as of 2025.

The sector's growth trajectory has been extraordinary by any measure. The Indian insurance aggregator market expanded from approximately ₹19.3 billion in 2021 to a projected ₹51.78 billion in 2024, with expectations to reach ₹179.26 billion by 2035—representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.95%. This positions India as one of the fastest-growing insurance aggregator markets globally, particularly within the Asia-Pacific region where digital adoption is accelerating rapidly.

Table 1

Table 1 Indian Insurance Aggregator Market Growth Projections (2021-2035)
Year	Market Size (Bn Rs.)	Growth Rate	Key Milestone
2021	19.3	-	Post-pandemic recovery
2024	51.78	168%	Regulatory maturity
2030	105.4	103%	Digital penetration
2035	179.26	70%	Market saturation

 

1.2. Research Problem and Significance

Despite the proliferation of aggregator platforms and dramatically improved access to insurance information, India's insurance penetration remains remarkably low at 4.2% of GDP—significantly below the global average of 7.0% and far behind developed markets. This paradox raises critical. Questions about the effectiveness of aggregator platforms in translating information accessibility into meaningful insurance adoption and comprehensive financial protection coverage.

Table 2

Table 2 Insurance Penetration Rates and Market Gaps Across Segments
Market Segment	; Penetration Rate	; Coverage Gap	Potential Market
Urban Life Insurance	45%	55%	₹80,000 crore
Rural Life Insurance	22%	78%	₹50,000+ crore
Urban Health Insurance	38%	62%	₹65,000 crore
Rural Health Insurance	18%	82%	₹45,000 crore
Motor Insurance	65%	35%	₹30,000 crore

The problem becomes even more concerning when examining specific segments. Rural insurance penetration is particularly acute, with only 22% of people in rural India having life insurance and less than 20% having health insurance. This represents an untapped market worth over ₹50,000 crore, but persistent barriers around irregular incomes, seasonal cash flows, high distribution costs, weak last- mile networks, and connectivity limitations continue to constrain development.

Furthermore, persistent concerns about mis-selling, information asymmetry, and inadequate consumer literacy suggest that technological solutions alone may be insufficient to address deeper structural challenges embedded in the insurance ecosystem. IRDAI data reveals troubling statistics: 20% of life insurance grievances in 2022-23 related to unfair business practices, primarily mis-selling. More alarmingly, the Council for Insurance Ombudsmen reported that 58% of all entertainable complaints were linked to mis-selling practices.

Table 3

Table 3 Distribution of Insurance Grievances in India (2022-23)
Grievance Category	Percentage of Total	Primary Issue
Mis-selling	58%	Product unsuitability
Unfair business practices	20%	Misleading information
Claim rejection	15%	Exclusion disputes
Policy servicing	7%	Documentation delays

 

The policy lapse rate provides additional indirect evidence of systemic problems. On average, 49% of policies lapse by the 61st month (five years) among the top-10 life insurers. While some lapses undoubtedly reflect genuine changes in financial circumstances, the magnitude strongly suggests that many customers either realized products were unsuitable for their needs or discovered they could not afford long-term premium commitments—classic indicators of inappropriate product selection driven by sales pressure rather than genuine needs assessment.

The emergence of Bima Sugam—IRDAI's ambitious Digital Public Infrastructure launched in September 2024—introduces a completely new paradigm that could fundamentally alter competitive dynamics and consumer experiences. Operating on a zero-commission model with universal insurer participation mandated by regulation, Bima Sugam represents an alternative to commercial aggregators that eliminates inherent conflicts of interest. Understanding how this neutral platform interacts with existing commercial aggregators, whether it can address the limitations of current models, and what implications it holds for the future of insurance distribution constitutes a pressing research priority.

 

1.3. Research Objectives

This research aims to accomplish five interconnected objectives:

1)    Analyze the comprehensive regulatory framework governing insurance aggregators in India and evaluate its effectiveness in ensuring consumer protection and maintaining market integrity.

2)    Examine the impact of aggregator platforms on policyholder choice across multiple dimensions including transparency, product variety, accessibility, decision-making quality, and ultimate outcomes.

3)    Assess the role of aggregators in enhancing insurance literacy and identify persistent barriers to consumer understanding.

4)    Evaluate the transformative potential of Bima Sugam as Digital Public Infrastructure and analyze its implications for existing aggregator business models.

5)    Provide evidence-based policy recommendations for enhancing consumer protection, improving literacy interventions, and optimizing regulatory frameworks.

 

1.4. Research Methodology

This study employs a comprehensive mixed-methods approach combining multiple analytical techniques and data sources to ensure robustness and reliability.

Table 4

Table 4 Research Methodology Framework
Method	Description
Secondary Data Analysis	Systematic examination of market reports, regulatory documents, industry publications, academic research, and financial data
Regulatory Framework Review	Comprehensive analysis of IRDAI regulations, disclosure requirements, and enforcement mechanisms
Market Performance Metrics	Tracking growth trajectories, penetration rates, and distribution patterns across geographic regions
Consumer Behavior Studies	Review of literacy levels, awareness surveys, grievance data, and policy lapse rates
Comparative Analysis	Evaluation of aggregators versus traditional channels across transparency, convenience, and service quality

 

2. Literature Review

2.1. Theoretical Foundations of DigitalIntermediation

Digital intermediation platforms fundamentally alter traditional market structures through several mechanisms. First, they reduce information asymmetries by making previously opaque information visible and comparable. Second, they lower transaction costs by eliminating multiple layers of intermediation. Third, they facilitate direct comparisons across competing offerings that would be prohibitively expensive through traditional channels.

In insurance markets—which are inherently characterized by complex products, opaque pricing structures, and significant information gaps between sellers and buyers—digital aggregators theoretically offer substantial welfare improvements through enhanced transparency and consumer empowerment.

Table 5

Table 5  Comparative Market Characteristics: Traditional Vs Digital Distribution
Market Characteristic	Traditional Channel	Digital Aggregator
Information Asymmetry	High	Low
Transaction Costs	High	Low
Product Visibility	Limited	Comprehensive
Price Transparency	Opaque	Transparent
Comparison Capability	Difficult	Easy
Geographic Reach	Limited	Unlimited

 

However, the literature on platform economics also highlights potential complications that temper optimistic predictions. Commission-driven revenue models may create conflicts of interest even on supposedly neutral platforms, incentivizing prioritization of high-commission products over genuinely optimal consumer choices. Network effects can lead to winner-take-all dynamics and market concentration, potentially reducing competitive pressures over time as dominant platforms emerge.

 

2.2. Insurance Distribution Channels and Consumer Behavior

Traditional insurance distribution in India has relied overwhelmingly on agent networks and bancassurance partnerships. Individual agents often represent single companies, creating inherent limitations on product variety and comparison capabilities. Commission structures incentivize sales volume and premium maximization over customer satisfaction or long-term relationship building.

Table 6

Table 6  Insurance Distribution Channel Comparison in India
Distribution Channel	Market Share	Avg Commission	Customer Satisfaction
Individual Agents	45%	High (80-100%)	Moderate
Bancassurance	30%	Moderate (40-60%)	Low-Moderate
Digital Aggregators	15%	High (80-100%)	High
Direct Sales	10%	None	High

 

Mis-selling represents perhaps the most serious systemic problem. Agents may recommend unsuitable products because they carry higher commissions, misrepresent policy features to close sales, or fail to adequately explain exclusions and limitations that significantly affect practical utility. Product churning—encouraging customers to cancel existing policies and purchase new ones to generate fresh commissions—destroys customer value while enriching agents.

Bancassurance partnerships, while expanding distribution reach, introduced similar problems at

organizational scale. Banks earned ₹21,773 crore in FY24 from insurance sales, creating powerful institutional incentives to prioritize sales targets over customer needs.

 

2.3. Regulatory Frameworks for Digital Financial Services

International experience with regulating digital financial intermediaries offers valuable lessons for evaluating India's approach. Effective regulatory frameworks typically balance three potentially conflicting objectives: consumer protection, market integrity, and innovation promotion.

 

Table 7

Table 7  International Comparison of Aggregator Regulatory Frameworks
Regulatory Aspect	India (IRDAI)	UK (FCA)	Singapore (MAS)
Disclosure Requirements	Comprehensive	Strict	Moderate
Capital Requirements	₹25 lakhs	£100,000	SGD 250,000
Commission Caps	Yes (product-wise)	No(disclosureonly)	No (market-driven)
Professional Indemnity	Mandatory	Mandatory	Mandatory
Grievance Timeline	5 days acknowledgment	8 weeks resolution	21 days response

 

IRDAI's regulatory approach reflects this international consensus. The Insurance Web Aggregators Regulations 2017 establish stringent entry requirements including minimum capital standards,

professional indemnity insurance, and trained personnel to ensure operational capacity.

 

2.4. Insurance Literacy and Consumer Education

The insurance literacy literature emphasizes a crucial distinction: information access does not automatically ensure understanding or appropriate decision-making. Effective literacy requires multiple components working together.

Table 8

Table 8 Insurance Literacy Levels Across Urban and Rural India
Literacy Component	Urban	Rural	National Avg
Basic awareness	68%	32%	48%
Product understanding	42%	18%	28%
Comparison capability	35%	12%	22%
Rights awareness	28%	10%	18%
Claims knowledge	38%	20%	25%

 

Research on literacy interventions demonstrates that structured, intensive programs can effectively improve knowledge and influence behavior. A study on insurance education among adolescents showed that targeted programs increased purchase intention by 23.4%, with consistent effects across gender and household income levels.

 

3. Regulatory Framework and Oversight

3.1. Comprehensive Regulatory Structure

IRDAI's regulatory framework for insurance web aggregators establishes a robust governance structure addressing multiple dimensions of platform operation.

Table 9

Table 9 IRDAI Regulatory Requirements for Insurance Aggregators
Regulatory Component	Key Requirements
Registration	Minimum paid-up capital ₹25 lakhs, perpetual license subject to compliance
Capital Adequacy	Maintain 100% net-worth continuously, professional indemnity insurance mandatory
Personnel	Principal officers and verifiers must pass IRDAI examinations
Platform Standards	Dedicated insurance website, no other commercial activities on same platform
Disclosure	Display IRDAI certificate, insurer partnerships, remuneration on request
Product Display	No ratings/rankings/endorsements, like-to-like comparisons only
Lead Management	Record all interactions, maximum 3 insurers contacted per lead
Grievance Redressal	Acknowledge within 5 days, maintain confidentiality

 

Registration and Licensing Requirements form the entry gateway. Aggregators must be registered as distinct legal entities—either companies or limited liability partnerships—demonstrating

organizational formality and accountability. Minimum paid-up capital of ₹25 lakhs ensures basic financial stability.

Disclosure Mandates represent perhaps the most crucial consumer protection mechanism. Platforms must prominently display IRDAI registration certificates establishing legitimacy. All insurer partnerships must be clearly identified. Remuneration structures must be disclosed upon request. Critically, aggregators are explicitly prohibited from providing ratings, rankings, or endorsements of insurance products.

Product Comparison Requirements establish standards for how information is presented. All product information must be authentic, unbiased, and based solely on data provided by insurers. Comparison charts must include comprehensive details covering eligibility, terms, benefits, premiums, exclusions, and claim settlement ratios.

 

3.2. Commission Structure and Revenue Model

Understanding aggregator incentives requires examining their revenue model in detail. Under IRDAI's commission regulations, aggregators earn remuneration comparable to agents and brokers, with maximum rates varying by product category.

Table 10

Table 10 Commission Structure Across Insurance Product Categories
Product Category	First Year Commission	Renewal Commission	Revenue Impact
Term Insurance	100%	25% (Y2), 14% (Y3+)	Very High
Traditional Life Plans	80%	17.50%	High
ULIPs	50-60%	10-12%	Moderate
Health Insurance	35%	35%	Moderate
Motor Insurance	30%	30%	Moderate

 

Life Insurance Products carry substantial front-loaded commissions reflecting difficulty of initial sales. For term insurance, aggregators receive up to 100% of first-year premium, 25% of second-year premium, and 14% for subsequent years. This means for a policy with ₹50,000 annual premium, an aggregator earns ₹40,000 in year one alone—creating powerful incentives to maximize sales volume.

Additional Revenue Streams supplement transactional commissions. Insurers may pay flat fees up to ₹50,000 per year per product displayed on comparison charts. These display fees create potential conflicts since aggregators might prioritize featuring products from insurers paying premium placement fees.

 

3.3. Regulatory Evolution and Recent Reforms

The regulatory framework continues evolving in response to market developments and emerging challenges.

Table 11

Table 11 Major Regulatory Reforms Timeline (2017-2024)
Reform Initiative	Year	Key Impact
Web Aggregator Regulations	2017	Established formal regulatory framework
Composite Licensing	2024	Enables unified life-general-health offerings
FDI Limit Increase	2024	Raised from 74% to 100%
Bima Sugam Launch	2024	Created neutral digital public infrastructure
Enhanced IRDAI Powers	2024	Strengthened enforcement capabilities

 

4. Impact on Policyholder Choice

4.1. Enhanced Transparency and Accessibility

Insurance aggregators have fundamentally transformed consumer access to insurance information through multiple mechanisms.

Table 12

Table 12 Digital Insurance Access Metrics: Growth 2019-2024
Access Metric	2019	2024	Growth
Registered Users (millions)	28.5	86.9	205%
Policies Sold (millions)	15.2	46.8	208%
Mobile Traffic	42%	65%	55%
Tier-2/3 Cities	22%	48%	118%
Avg Comparison Time (mins)	45	8	-82%

 

Comprehensive Product Visibility provides unprecedented transparency. By consolidating offerings from multiple insurers on unified platforms, aggregators enable consumers to simultaneously view 20+ insurers' products, comparing premiums, coverage, claim settlement ratios, and policy terms.

Digital Accessibility proves particularly significant. Over 65% of insurance searches now occur via mobile devices. PolicyBazaar alone has served over 86.9 million registered users and sold more than

46.8         million policies—demonstrating massive consumer reach.

 

4.2.  Geographic Penetration and Market Expansion

Aggregator platforms have played crucial roles in expanding insurance beyond traditional metropolitan strongholds.

Table 13

Table 13 Insurance Penetration Growth Across Geographic Tiers
City Tier	2021 Penetration	2024 Penetration	Growth Rate
Tier-1 (Metro)	52%	61%	17%
Tier-2 Cities	28%	48%	71%
Tier-3 Cities	15%	32%	113%
Rural Areas	8%	14%	75%

 

Tier-2 City Growth has been remarkable, with 70% growth in online motor insurance adoption over three years. Cities like Indore (31% increase), Jaipur (191% growth), and Lucknow (15% expansion) substantially exceeded metropolitan growth rates.

Table 14

Table 14 Persistent Barriers to Rural Insurance Adoption
Barrier Type	Description
Irregular Incomes	Agricultural and informal sector cash flow unpredictability
Seasonal Cash Flows	Harvest-dependent liquidity incompatible with regular premiums
High Distribution Costs	Geographic dispersion makes individual acquisition expensive
Weak Last-Mile Networks	Limited physical infrastructure and human resources
Connectivity Limitations	Unreliable internet and poor mobile network coverage
Digital Literacy Gaps	Limited familiarity with online financial transactions

 

4.3. Product Variety and Competitive Pricing

Aggregators provide diverse product portfolios spanning multiple insurers and categories.

Table 15

Table 15 Product Portfolio Comparison Across Major Aggregators
Aggregator Platform	Number of Products	Insurer Partners
PolicyBazaar	390+	49
InsuranceDekho	280+	42
Coverfox	200+	35
Ditto	150+	28

 

4.4. Limitations and Consumer Challenges

Despite improved information access, several factors constrain effectiveness.

Table 16

Table 16 Key Limitations in Aggregator-Mediated Consumer Choice
Challenge	Impact on Consumer Decision-Making
Cognitive Complexity	Probabilistic reasoning and long-term planning exceed typical capacity
Comparison Fatigue	Too many similar options lead to confusion and suboptimal choices
Hidden Quality Dimensions	Claim settlement efficiency only apparent during actual claims
Algorithmic Opacity	Cannot understand how recommendations are generated
Commission Conflicts	High-commission products may receive subtle preferential treatment
Digital Divide	Poor, elderly, rural residents cannot effectively use platforms

 

5. Impact on Policyholder Literacy

5.1. Consumer Awareness Challenges

Despite increased access to insurance information, literacy remains a profound challenge.

Table 17

Table 17 Insurance Literacy Components: Urban Vs Rural Comparison
Knowledge Area	Urban	Rural	National
Risk Pooling Concepts	52%	18%	32%
Premium Determination	38%	12%	23%
Policy Terms Understanding	45%	22%	31%
Exclusion Awareness	32%	15%	22%
Claims Procedure Knowledge	48%	20%	31%
Rights Awareness	28%	10%	18%

 

Insurance penetration stands at only 4.2% of GDP. Rural penetration is worse: only 22% have life insurance and less than 20% have health insurance. These low rates reflect not merely affordability constraints but awareness barriers.

 

5.2. Mis-Selling and Information Asymmetry

The persistence of widespread mis-selling despite transparency represents critical policy failure.

Table 18

Table 18 Mis-Selling Indicators and Consumer Impact Metrics
Mis-Selling Indicator	Value	Implication
Life insurance grievances (mis-selling)	20%	1 in 5 complaints
Ombudsmen entertainable complaints	58%	Systemic problem
Policy lapse rate by year 5	49%	Product unsuitability
Bancassurance income (FY24)	₹21,773 crore	Incentive misalignment
Average wealth loss on early lapse	₹ 70,000	Consumer harm

 

IRDAI data shows 20% of life insurance grievances related to unfair business practices. Council for Insurance Ombudsmen reported 58% of complaints linked to mis-selling.

 

5.3. Role of Aggregators in Consumer Education

Insurance aggregators possess significant potential to enhance literacy through multiple mechanisms.

Table 19

Table 19 Aggregator Educational Contribution Mechanisms
Educational Mechanism	Description
Simplified Presentation	Plain language, visual aids, infographics, comparison charts
Educational Content	Blogs, articles, videos, calculators, FAQ sections
Comparison Tools	Side-by-side evaluation enabling trade-off assessment
Digital Literacy Integration	AI-powered recommendations, chatbots, personalized guidance

 

5.4. Effectiveness of Educational Initiatives

Despite efforts, structural barriers limit effectiveness.

Table 20

Table 20 Educational Intervention Effectiveness Comparison
Intervention Type	Reach	Effectiveness
Platform educational content	High	Low-Moderate
Government awareness campaigns	Moderate	Low
Structured classroom programs	Low	High
Insurance company workshops	Low-Moderate	Moderate
NGO community programs	Low	Moderate-High

 

5.5. Regulatory Initiatives to Enhance Literacy

IRDAI has implemented various literacy initiatives.

Table 21

Table 21 IRDAI Consumer Literacy Initiatives
Initiative	Description
Mandatory Awareness Policies	All insurers must conduct consumer education activities
Consumer Education Portal	policyholder.gov.in provides objective information
Educational Institution Collaboration	Integration into school and university curricula
Insurance Awareness Day	Annual celebration with seminars and workshops

 

6. The Emergence of Bima Sugam: Transformative Digital Infrastructure

6.1. Platform Overview and Architecture

Bima Sugam represents IRDAI's most ambitious initiative to universalize insurance access. Launched in September 2024, this unified digital marketplace functions as insurance's "UPI moment." The platform operates under Bima Sugam Regulations 2024, structured as Section 8 not-for-profit company with distributed insurer shareholding ensuring neutrality.

Table 22

Table 22 Bima Sugam Platform Characteristics
Feature	Description
Governance Model	Section 8 not-for-profit with distributed insurer shareholding
Revenue Model	Zero-commission, operational cost recovery only
Insurer Participation	Mandatory for all licensed insurers
Consumer Access	Single e-Insurance Account (e-IA) linked to Aadhaar/PAN
Neutrality	No conflicts of interest, consumer-centric design

 

6.2. Key Features and Transformative Capabilities

Table 23

Table 23 Bima Sugam Key Features and Consumer Benefits
Feature	Benefit
Single e-Insurance Account	Consolidates all policies across insurers in one location
Policy Portability	Easy switching without benefit forfeiture
Digital KYC	Fast e-KYC using Aadhaar, instant policy issuance
Comprehensive Comparison	Universal insurer coverage by regulatory mandate
One-Click Renewal	Simplified processes with automated payments
Real-Time Claim Tracking	Transparency during claims processing
Zero Commission Model	Eliminates conflicts of interest
Healthcare Integration	Planned connectivity with ABDM for seamless claims

 

6.3. Impact on Market Competition and Consumer Empowerment

Bima Sugam fundamentally alters competitive dynamics by providing neutral comprehensive access.

Table 24

Table 24 Bima Sugam Vs Commercial Aggregators: Structural Comparison
Dimension	Commercial Aggregators	Bima Sugam
Revenue Model	Commission-based	Zero-commission
Insurer Coverage	Selective partnerships	Universal mandate
Conflicts of Interest	Present	Eliminated
Governance	For-profit	Not-for-profit
Transparency	High	Complete
Consumer Cost	Hidden (commissions)	Minimal (operational)

 

6.4. Implementation Challenges and Barriers

Despite transformative potential, significant challenges require navigation.

Table 25

Table 25 Bima Sugam Implementation Challenges
Challenge	Description
Technical Integration	Legacy system compatibility, API development, cybersecurity
Digital Literacy	Consumer capability to navigate online interfaces effectively
Stakeholder Onboarding	Phased rollout coordination, change management
Data Privacy	Centralized storage creates attractive targets for cyberattacks
Commercial Aggregator Response	Incumbent platforms face existential challenges

 

6.5. Projections and Strategic Significance

IRDAI projects Bima Sugam could double India's insurance penetration by addressing structural barriers.

Table 26

Table 26 Bima Sugam Impact Projections (2024-2030)
Metric	Current (2024)	Projected (2030)	Growth
Insurance Penetration	4.2% of GDP	8.4% of GDP	100%
Covered Population	520 million	1,040 million	100%
Digital Transactions	45%	85%	89%
Rural Penetration	20%	45%	125%

 

7. Comparative Analysis: Aggregators vs Traditional Distribution

7.1. Aggregators vs Insurance Agents

 

Table 27

Table 27 Aggregators Vs Insurance Agents: Feature Comparison
Dimension	Aggregators	Agents
Product Variety	390+ products	10-50 products
Transparency	High (regulated)	Variable
Convenience	24/7 online	Business hours
Personalization	Algorithm-driven	Human relationship
Claims Support	Standardized	Highly variable
Commission Disclosure	On request	Rarely disclosed

 

7.2. Aggregators vs Insurance Brokers

Table 28

Table 28  Aggregators Vs Brokers: Positioning and Capabilities
Dimension	Aggregators	Brokers
Scope of Services	Retail comparison	Comprehensive advisory
Target Market	Individual consumers	Corporate + HNI
Regulatory Accountability	IRDAI licensed	IRDAI licensed (higher)
Remuneration	Commissions	Commissions + fees
Expertise Level	Standardized	Specialized
Market Positioning	Mass market	Premium segment

 

7.3. Implications for Distribution Strategy

Table 29

Table 29 Distribution Channel Specialization and Optimal Positioning
Channel	Optimal Use Case
Aggregators	Standardized products, digitally-literate consumers, urban markets
Agents	Personalized relationships, rural areas, elderly consumers
Brokers	Complex corporate needs, high-net-worth individuals, specializedrisks
Bima Sugam	Universal access, neutral comparison, public infrastructure

 

8. Policy Recommendations

8.1. Enhancing Consumer Protection and Literacy

Table 30

Table 30 Consumer Protection Enhancement Recommendations
Recommendation	Implementation Approach
Structured Financial Education	Integrate insurance literacy into school/college curricula
Mandatory Pre-Purchase Disclosures	Standardized Key Information Documents at point of sale
Enhanced Grievance Capacity	Expanded IGMS and Ombudsman network with faster timelines
Commission Transparency	Public disclosure of rates before purchase decisions

 

8.2. Regulatory Reforms and Oversight Enhancement

Table 31

Table 31 Regulatory Reform Priorities
Reform Area	Proposed Action
Real-Time Monitoring	AI-driven compliance systems analyzing sales conversations
Incentive Realignment	Outcome-based rewards tied to retention and satisfaction
Composite Licensing	Fast-track implementation with transitional support
FDI Liberalization	Increase to 100% with robust prudential safeguards

 

8.3. Infrastructure and Technology Development

Table 32

Table 32 Infrastructure Development Recommendations
Infrastructure Need	Development Priority
Accelerated Bima Sugam Rollout	Meet December 2025 full consumer access timeline
Data Protection Framework	Insurance-specific privacy regulations
Interoperability Standards	Seamless data exchange across ecosystem
Rural Digital Infrastructure	Broadband, literacy programs, multilingual interfaces

 

9. Conclusion

Insurance aggregator platforms have fundamentally transformed India's insurance distribution landscape over the past decade, leveraging digital technology to enhance transparency, expand accessibility, and provide consumers unprecedented capabilities for comparing products and making informed decisions. The sector has demonstrated remarkable growth—expanding from ₹19.3 billion in 2021 to a projected ₹179.26 billion by 2035 at an impressive 11.95% CAGR—while extending insurance access beyond metropolitan strongholds to Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities experiencing 70-110% growth.

Table 33

Table 33 Aggregator Impact Assessment: Achievements Vs Remaining Gaps
Achievement	Metric	Remaining Challenge
Market Growth	11.95% CAGR	Low base (4.2% GDP penetration)
User Reach	86.9M registered users	520M still uninsured
Geographic Expansion	110% Tier-3 growth	70% rural coverage gap
Digital Adoption	65% mobile traffic	Digital literacy barriers
Transparency	High disclosure standards	58% mis-selling complaints

 

Yet this growth story reveals only partial success toward universal financial protection coverage. Insurance penetration remains at 4.2% of GDP with particularly acute deficits in rural areas. Mis- selling persists at alarming rates—58% of complaints relate to mis-selling and 49% of policies lapse by year five.

The emergence of Bima Sugam as neutral Digital Public Infrastructure represents a watershed moment potentially addressing fundamental limitations. Operating on zero-commission model with universal insurer participation, Bima Sugam eliminates conflicts of interest while providing comprehensive market visibility. IRDAI projects this platform could double insurance penetration.

 

Table 34

Table 34 Critical Success Factors for Realizing Bima Sugam's Potential
Success Factor	Requirements
Technical Excellence	Robust integration, cybersecurity, system reliability
Digital Literacy	Sustained education reaching underserved populations
Stakeholder Cooperation	Alignment among insurers, intermediaries, regulators
Policy Commitment	Adequate resources, clear authority, continuous adaptation
Consumer Trust	Early success, tangible benefits, problem-free operations

 

However, realizing transformative potential depends on effective technical integration, digital literacy initiatives, consumer awareness campaigns, and stakeholder coordination. The trajectory will ultimately depend on successfully aligning technological capabilities with genuine needs, regulatory safeguards with market efficiency, and commercial incentives with social objectives embodied in "Insurance for All by 2047" vision.

This research contributes to understanding how digital intermediation can serve financial inclusion goals while identifying persistent challenges. Future research should track Bima Sugam outcomes, evaluate literacy intervention effectiveness, and assess whether technology-enabled distribution delivers promised benefits. The insurance aggregation journey continues evolving with uncertain outcomes requiring careful monitoring, rigorous evaluation, and evidence-based course corrections.

 

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

None. 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

 

REFERENCES

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India. (2017). Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Insurance Web Aggregators) Regulations, 2017. Government of India.

Market Research Future. (2025). Insurance Aggregator Market Size: Global Report 2024–2035. Market Research Future.

Varier, A. (2024, September 3). Mis-selling of Life Insurance Policies at Alarming Level, Says IRDAI. Business Standard.

The Indian Express. (2025, September 18). Bima Sugam Portal Launched: Single Digital Marketplace for Insurance. The Indian Express.

Ernst and Young LLP. (2023). Insurance for all: Enhancing Insurance Coverage Across India. EY India.

Ken Research. (2025). India Insurance Broking Market Set to Double by 2030. Ken Research Private Limited.

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company. (2022). Quality of Insurance Literacy in Indira Report 2022. ICICI Lombard.

Does Insurance Literacy Shape Adolescents’ Purchase Intention? Evidence from India. (2025). Applied Economics, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2558236

Drishti IAS. (2025, September 18). Bima Sugam: Unified Digital Marketplace for Insurance in India. Drishti IAS Publications.

Health Insurance Awareness and its Uptake in India: Evidence from National Surveys. (2021). BMC Health Services Research, 21(1).