GANDHISM AND GANDHI'S POLITICAL VALUES FOR GENERATION Z: APPLICATIONS, DIFFICULTIES AND CONTEMPORARY OPPORTUNITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ShodhSamajik.v2.i2.2025.175Keywords:
Mahatma Gandhi, Generation Z, Gandhism, Satya, Political Values, Ahimsa, Satyagraha, Swaraj, Sarvodaya, Youth Politics, Digital CitizenshipAbstract
Mahatma Gandhi, Political Philosophy & some Elements of Contemporary Ethical Thought in Politics remain the significant ethical representation of politics today. His concepts of truth (Satya), non-violence (Ahimsa), Satyagraha, Swaraj, Sarvodaya, trusteeship are akin to decentralisation and constructive work that were formulated during the period of India's freedom struggle against colonialism and social injustice but whose relevance transcends the circumstances under which these ideas originated. Generation Z are living through a political and social environment of an unprecedented kind, having grown up in the midst of social media, digital technology, globalisation, political polarisation, disinformation that comes at you twenty-four hours a day and economic vulnerability/depression with the added specter of ecocide. The paper looks at the need of Gandhi's political values for Generation Z and their possible translation in democratic and digitalised spaces of our current context. Employing a qualitative, interpretive design—grounded in Gandhi's original texts and the accepted secondary literature on Gandhism, youth politics, and digital media—the analysis constructs a translation framework that adjudicates each of the seven principles against three inter-correlated criteria of fidelity to Gandhi's original moral intention; transferability under present conditions; and defensibility in light of contemporary conceptions of equality and human rights. Exact opposite of that, Satya can provide a foundation for responsible digital citizenship, Ahimsa — offer ethical guidance regarding online disagreement, Satyagraha — lay the abstract for what constitutes sustained nonviolent civil action however big or small it is going to be, Swaraj — fortify intellectual dignity and self-restraint while Sarvodaya till offers a framework supporting social justice and inclusive development. It explores the limits of applying Gandhian ideas in confronting caste, gender and industrial society and the corresponding structural pressures of contemporary attention economy. It argues that Gandhi has more relevance for Generation Z as someone whose moral precepts need to be appropriated critically and imaginatively—not blindly emulated, through twentieth-century forms.
References
Ambedkar, B. R. (1945). What Congress and Gandhi Have Done to the Untouchables. Thacker and Co.
Ambedkar, B. R. (2014). Annihilation of Caste: The Annotated Critical Edition (S. Anand, Ed.). Navayana. (Original work published 1936)
Bennett, W. L., and Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Brown, J. M. (1991). Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope. Yale University Press.
Chatterjee, M. (1983). Gandhi’s Religious Thought. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05365-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05365-0
Chenoweth, E., and Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. Columbia University Press.
Dalton, D. (1993). Mahatma Gandhi: Nonviolent Power in Action. Columbia University Press.
Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. Pew Research Center.
Gandhi, M. K. (1927). An Autobiography or the Story of My Experiments With Truth. Navajivan Publishing House.
Parekh, B. (1989). Gandhi’s Political Philosophy: A Critical Examination. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12242-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12242-4
Parel, A. J. (Ed.). (2000). Gandhi, Freedom, and Self-Rule. Lexington Books.
Pyarelal. (1958). Mahatma Gandhi: The Last Phase (Vol. 2). Navajivan Publishing House.
Ribble, M. (2015). Digital Citizenship in Schools: Nine Elements All Students Should Know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
Rudolph, L. I., and Rudolph, S. H. (2006). Postmodern Gandhi and Other Essays: Gandhi in the World and at Home. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226731315.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226731315.001.0001
Ruskin, J. (1862). Unto This Last: Four Essays on the First Principles of Political Economy. Smith, Elder and Co.
Sharp, G. (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Porter Sargent.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711
Terchek, R. J. (1998). Gandhi: Struggling for Autonomy. Rowman and Littlefield.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy—and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Atria Books.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., and Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Wardle, C., and Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making (Council of Europe Report DGI(2017)09). Council of Europe.
Weber, T. (2001). Gandhi, Gandhism and the Gandhians. Rupa and Co. Pasted markdown
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Manjunatha R, Dr. Nasreen Taj (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



















