LEGAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: BALANCING INNOVATION, RESPONSIBILITY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Authors

  • Amin Amirian Farsani Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities Sciences, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ShodhSamajik.v2.i2.2025.53

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Legal Responsibility, Ethics of AI, Human Rights, Governance, Accountability

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly transformed modern societies, permeating sectors ranging from health care and criminal justice to education and public administration. While AI systems promise efficiency and innovation, they simultaneously generate significant legal and ethical dilemmas. This article explores the dual nature of AI as both a driver of progress and a source of regulatory and moral challenges. Legally, the discussion addresses liability gaps in autonomous decision-making, algorithmic bias, and data ownership under emerging frameworks such as the EU AI Act and UNESCO’s Ethics of AI. Ethically, it examines tensions between human autonomy and technological determinism, accountability deficits in self-learning systems, and implications for human dignity. The research argues that effective AI governance must be grounded in transparency, human oversight, and moral accountability, integrating legal safeguards with ethical obligations. By adopting an “Ethics-by-Design” approach, societies can reconcile innovation with the imperatives of justice and human rights. The article concludes that only through a convergent legal and ethical framework can AI evolve as a genuinely responsible technology serving human welfare.

References

Calo, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Policy: Accountability by Design. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 23(2), 101–135. https://yjolt.org

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 167. https://eur/

Floridi, L. (2021). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198860877.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198860877.001.0001

IEEE Standards Association. (2020). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-Being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (Version 2). IEEE.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Publishing. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles

Pagallo, U. (2018). The Law of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Springer International Publishing.

State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. 2016). Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Referenced as Precedent on Algorithmic Sentencing.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15